This question of necessity raises several other fundamental questions, forcing one to think outside the modern English language box in regards to long-cherished and deeply-held beliefs of religious orthodoxy, historical, intellectual and other misconceptions. And if that doesn’t adequately describe 21st Century American religious, scientific, educational, political and other confusion, most likely nothing ever will.
For example, note the rather threatening tone implied in the King James English:
1) Thou shalt not kill,
2) Thou shalt not steal and
3) Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
The conservative religious sounding tone and threatening archaic style of this language here in a digital age land of once shining seas, likely comes across as threatening, mean-spirited and religiously offensive to most Americans, as it does to me personally.
Instead of insisting on using the flowery archaic King James version commonly found and far less commonly followed, in many conservative fundamentalist hard on one’s backside pews of today, consider how the original Hebrew could and arguably should be translated into our modern common usage English reality:
You shouldn’t kill.
You shouldn’t steal.
You shouldn’t say untrue things about your neighbor.
By revising the same English language into modern usage form while remaining fair to the original source, a much more reasonable sounding, kinder and less threatening God suddenly emerges, in language making perfect sense if God actually cares about people. As opposed for example, to a vague and distant “deist” type of God, who doesn’t give a damn about how we treat each other or otherwise, rape, pillage and pollute his creation to the high heavens, kingdom come and beyond to our collective capitalist enterprising hearts’ content.
Virtually all modern progressives are in complete agreement with these three basic moral laws, even if they don’t ever read the Bible or even believe in God. Thus, among other things, this short illustration demonstrates how language and other cultural barriers, in particular from centuries past using the same “English” language, often leads to all manner of erroneous misconceptions, conclusions, deliberate falsifications and outright lies.
Today the archaic King James English version is invariably branded by liberals as belonging in a category labeled “religion”, being entirely undesirable to even mentioned in a supposed “free and democratic society”. While the less religious sounding updated English example is universally viewed as being basic to human rights, common decency, morality and ethics.
And, it remains a significant cornerstone of not only American, but global ethics, morality and legal law. Not to mention, it is both prudent and correct to adhere to such common moral decency if we are to have any hope of living in a peaceful and just 21st Century reality.
How accurate is the Bible? Perhaps a better question is, just how badly deceived and otherwise completely and entirely misinformed, are modern-day Americans in general and, often hard working, tax paying and, most unfortunately for everybody including their own children, “church going” sincere religious fundamentalists in particular?
Tags: activism, Afghanistan, agnostic, Anti-war, atheist, Beck, behavior, Bible, Catholic, children, Christ, Conservative, culture, Democrat, education, Educational, end times, ethics, evangelical, evil, faith, Fox News, free, free speech, freedom, fundamentalist, God, golden rule, History, hope, human rights, independent, Instructional, Iraq, Jesus, Jewish, kids, Liberal, love, Maddow, Media, morality, MSNBC, New Testament, news, O'Reily, Olbermann, Old Testament, peace, Peace Issues, people, philosophy, Politics, populist, Progressive, prophecy, Protestant, psychology, reason, Religion, Republican, Right-Wing, Science, sin, sinner, society, ten commandments, veterans, violence, War